基于后人类思想的国际城市研究：理论溯源与概念辨析

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.01.001

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2109 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要进入二十一世纪以来，以赛博格城市、混合城市、城市政治生态学、集合城市主义为代表的后人类城市研究思想成为揭示当代城市中人类与非人类复杂交织关系的前沿性理论视角。本文在深入探讨上述概念的理论渊源、主要思想观点及其应用进展的基础上，指出后人类城市思想在我国城市研究中的可能方法论意义，即城市分析不能将人类与非人类绝对割裂地看待，而需要将城市中的主体或客体重新定义为人类与非人类的“混杂体”，整合以往分散在自然、工程、社科与人文等不同领域中的观察与分析，拓展人们对城市过程的认知，开创更多的城市研究可能性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王莉莉
	陈浩

关键词 ：后人类主义, 赛博格城市, 混合城市, 城市政治生态学, 集合城市主义

Abstract：Since the beginning of the 21st century, post-humanist conceptual frameworks such as cyborg urbanization, the hybrid city, urban political ecology, and assemblage urbanism have become key perspectives to reveal and theorize the complex intertwining of human and non-human actants and processes in contemporary cities. What are the philosophical foundations of these conceptual frameworks? How did they evolve over time and interact with each other? What are the established or emergent urban questions that they attempt to address? What are the empirical studies that employ these frameworks to examine urban questions in specific contexts? Based on an extensive review of international literature, this article aims to provide an overview of the four post-humanist frameworks. Specifically, the article traces their theoretical origins to three main post-humanist theories-Haraway's cyborg theory, Deleuze and Guattari's rhizome theory, and actor-network theory-and a relational view of geography and space. Then, the article illustrates the main theoretical claims and epistemological principles of the four conceptual frameworks and reviews how they were applied in empirical studies: Firmly grounded on an ontology characterized by relationality and hybridity, these urban theories refuse to view the human and non-human separately; Rather, they claim that urban subjects and objects are hybrids of both human and hon-human actors or processes. This article also highlights the differences between the four frameworks. At last, the article explores how such post-humanist perspectives may generate new insights in the study of Chinese cities. Recognizing the latent dangers of flat ontology and anarchistic epistemology of the four frameworks, the article suggests that they however may help us better understand China's urban questions, especially in a context of widespread and profound technological development and socio-natural transformation.

Key words： post-humanism cyborg urbanization hybrid city urban political ecology assemblage urbanism

收稿日期: 2019-12-17

PACS:

K901

基金资助:广东省普通高校创新人才类项目（2018WQNCX157）

作者简介: 王莉莉(1985-),女,山东济宁人,助理教授,主要研究方向为批判性城市理论。E-mail:wangll3@sustech.edu.cn。

引用本文:

王莉莉, 陈浩. 基于后人类思想的国际城市研究：理论溯源与概念辨析[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(1): 1-10,93. WANG Li-li, CHEN Hao. GLOBAL URBAN STUDIES BASED ON POST-HUMANIST THOUGHTS: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND RELEVANT CONCEPTS. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 36(1): 1-10,93.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.01.001 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I1/1

[1]	Haraway D J. Simians, Cyborgs and Women:The Reinvention of Nature[M]. London:Free Association Books, 1991:149-181.
[2]	Deleuze G, Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1987:3-25.
[3]	Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1993:51-55,82-85,89-90.
[4]	Mitchell W J. Me++:The Cyborg City and the Networked City[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2003:31.
[5]	Gandy M. Cyborg urbanization:Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2005,29(1):26-49.
[6]	Hubbard P. City[M]. London:Routledge, 2006:129-163.
[7]	Swyngedouw E. The city as hybrid:On nature, society, and cyborg urbanization[J]. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1996,7(2):65-80.
[8]	Swyngedouw E. Circulations and metabolisms:(Hybrid) Natures and (cyborg) cities[J]. Science as Culture, 2006,15(2):105-121.
[9]	Swyngedouw E. Metabolic urbanization:The making of cyborg cities[M]//Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E. In the Nature of Cities:Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London:Routledge, 2006:21-40.
[10]	Wilson M W. Cyborg geographies:Towards hybrid epistemologies[J]. Gender, Place and Culture, 2009,16(5):499-516.
[11]	Ferlong K. Small technologies, big change:Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,35(4):460-482.
[12]	Lokman K. Cyborg landscapes:Choreographing resilient interactions between infrastructure, ecology, and society[J]. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 2017,12(1):60-73.
[13]	Whatmore S. Hybrid Geographies[M]. London:Sage,2002:1-7,146-166.
[14]	Heynen N, Ka?ka M, Swyngedouw E. In the Nature of Cities:Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism[M]. Abingdon:Routledge, 2006:3-5,8-14,31-35.
[15]	Cook I R, Swyngedouw E. Cities, social cohesion and the environment:Towards a future research agenda[J]. Urban Studies, 2012, 49(9):1959-1979.
[16]	Farías I. Introduction:Decentring the object of urban studies[M]//Farías I, Bender T. Urban Assemblages:How ANT Changes Urban Studies. London and New York:Routledge, 2010:1-17.
[17]	McFarlane C. Assemblage and critical urbanism[J]. City, 2011, 15(2):204-224.
[18]	Brenner N, Madden D J, Wachsmuth D. Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory[J]. City, 2011,15(2):225-240.
[19]	Hinchliffe S J. Posthumanism[M]//Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, et al. The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th ed. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2009:564-565.
[20]	Badmington N. Posthumanism[M]. London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2000:69.
[21]	Panelli R. More-than-human social geographies:Posthuman and other possibilities[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,34(1):79-87.
[22]	Whatmore S. Humanism's excess:Some thoughts on the ‘post-human/ist’ agenda[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2004,36:1360-1363.
[23]	卢薇,尹铎,朱竑.西方超越人类的地理学研究进展[J].地理学报, 2019,74(10):2178-2191.[Lu Wei, Yin Duo, Zhu Hong. The progress of more-than-human geographies in Western geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(10):2178-2191.]
[24]	翟青,甄峰.移动信息技术影响下的城市空间结构研究进展[J].人文地理,2012,27(6):50-55,129.[Zhai Qing, Zhen Feng. Review of urban spatial structure research influenced by mobile information and communication technology[J]. Human Geography, 2012,27(6):50-55,129.]
[25]	甄峰,翟青,陈刚,等.信息时代移动社会理论构建与城市地理研究[J].地理研究,2012,31(2):197-206.[Zhen Feng, Zhai Qing, Chen Gang, et al. Mobile social theory construction and urban geographic research in the information era[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(2):197-206.]
[26]	吴康,方创琳,赵渺希,等.京津城际高速铁路影响下的跨城流动空间特征[J].地理学报,2013,68(2):159-174.[Wu Kang, Fang Chuanglin, Zhao Miaoxi, et al. The intercity space of flow influenced by high-speed rail:A case study for the rail transit passenger behavior between Beijing and Tianjin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(2):159-174.]
[27]	徐银凤,汪德根.中国城市空间结构的高铁效应研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(9):1216-1230.[Xu Yinfeng, Wang Degen. Research progress and prospects of high-speed rail effects on urban spatial structure in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(9):1216-1230.]
[28]	张嘉欣,千庆兰.信息时代下"淘宝村" 的空间转型研究[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(10):81-84,101.[Zhang Jiaxin, Qian Qinglan. Research on the spatial transformation of "Taobao Village" in information age[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015,22(10):81-84,101.]
[29]	杨思,李郇,魏宗财,等. "互联网+" 时代淘宝村的空间变迁与重构[J].规划师,2016,32(5):117-123.[Yang Si, Li Xun, Wei Zongcai, et al. Spatial transition and restructuring of Taobao villages in internet+ era[J]. Planners, 2016,32(5):117-123.]
[30]	罗震东,何鹤鸣.新自下而上进程——电子商务作用下的乡村城镇化[J].城市规划,2017,41(3):31-40.[Luo Zhendong, He Heming. New urbanization from below in China:Rural urbanization driven by e-commerce[J]. City Planning Review, 2017,41(3):31-40.]
[31]	陈晓红,万鲁河.城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(12):1450-1457.[Chen Xiaohong, Wan Luhe. The interactive mechanisms for the coordination and vulnerability between regional urban and eco-environment[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(12):1450-1457.]
[32]	石勇.灾害情景下城市脆弱性评估研究[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2010.[Shi Yong. Research on Vulnerability Assessment of Cities on the Disaster Scenario:A Case Study of Shanghai City[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2010.]
[33]	Clynes M E, Kline N S. Cyborg and space[J]. Astronautics, 1960(9):26-27,74-76.
[34]	Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, the Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture Vol.I[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1996.
[35]	Castells M. The Power of Identity, the Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture Vol.Ⅱ[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1997.
[36]	Castells M. End of Millennium, the Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture Vol.Ⅲ[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1998.
[37]	Urry J. Mobilities[M]. Cambridge:Polity, 2007:89,149-155,186, 288-289.
[38]	Latour B. Science in Action[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1987:4,80,103-145.
[39]	Bauchspies W, Croissant J, Restivo S. Science, Technology, and Society:A Sociological Approach[M]. Malden:Wiley-Blackwell, 2005:1-16.
[40]	Felt U, Fouché R, Miller C A. et al. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (4th ed.)[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2017:21-24,31-49.
[41]	Mitchell W J. City of Bits:Space, Place, and the Infobahn[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1995:21,112,134,160.
[42]	McShane C. Down the Asphalt Path:The Automobile and the American City[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1994.
[43]	Nader R. Unsafe at Any Speed:The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile[M]. New York:Grossman Publishers, 1965.
[44]	Carson R. Silent Spring(40th Anniversary Edition)[M]. Boston and New York:Mariner Books, 2002:20-22,178-184.
[45]	Schivelbusch W. Disenchanted Night:The Industrialisation of Light in the Nineteenth Century[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1988.
[46]	Schivelbusch W. The Railway Journey:The Industrialisation of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1986.
[47]	Law J. After ANT:Complexity, naming and topology[M]//Law J, Hassard J. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford:Blackwell, 1999:1-14.
[48]	蔡晓梅,刘美新.后结构主义背景下关系地理学的研究进展[J].地理学报,2019,74(8):1680-1694.[Cai Xiaomei, Liu Meixin. Research progress of relational geography under the background of poststructuralism[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1680-1694.]
[49]	Massey D. Space-time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1999,24(3):261-276.
[50]	Harvey D. Between space and time:Reflections on the geographical imagination[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1990,80(3):418-434.
[51]	Harvey D. Space as a keyword[M]//Castree N, Gregory D. David Harvey:A Critical Reader. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK:Blackwell, 2006:270-293.
[52]	Massey D. The elusiveness of place[M]//Massey D. For Space. London and Thousand Oakes:Sage, 2005:130-142.
[53]	Lefebvre H. The Production of Space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1991:26-46,245-246.
[54]	Brenner N. The urban question as a scale question:Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000,24(20):361-378.
[55]	Amin A, Thrift N. Cities:Reimagining the Urban[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 2002:83,132.
[56]	Smith R G. World city actor-networks[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2003,27(1):25-44.
[57]	Jacobs J M. Urban geographies I:Still thinking cities relationally[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2012,36(3):412-422.
[58]	Roy A. Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning[J]. Planning Theory, 2011,10(1):6-15.
[59]	McFarlane C. The city as assemblage:Dwelling and urban space[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2011,29(4):649-671.
[60]	Smith N. Uneven Development:Nature, Capital and the Production of Space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1984:33-34,65-91.
[61]	Castree N, Braun B. Social Nature:Theory, Practice and Politics[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 2001:1-21,189-207.
[62]	Mumford L. The City in History:Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects[M]. San Diego, New York, London:Harvest Books, 1968:478-481.
[63]	Graham S, Marvin S. Splintering Urbanism[M]. London:Routledge, 2001:13-15,22-29,91-113,137-175,381-387.
[64]	Coutard O. Urban space and the development of networks:A discussion of the "splintering urbanism" thesis[M]//Coutard O, Hanley R, Zimmerman R. Sustaining Urban Networks:The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems. London:Routledge, 2004:48-64.
[65]	Odendaal N. Splintering urbanism or split agendas? Examining the spatial distribution of technology access in relation to ICT policy in Durban, South Africa[J]. Urban Studies, 2011,48(11):2375-2397
[66]	Jiménez A C. The right to infrastructure:A prototype for open source urbanism[J]. Environment and Planning D, 2014,32(2):342-362.
[67]	Jaglin S. Differentiating networked services in Cape Town:Echoes of splintering urbanism[J]. Geoforum, 2008,39(6):1897-1906.
[68]	Coutard O. Placing splintering urbanism:Introduction[J]. Geoforum, 2008,39(6):1815-1820.
[69]	McLean A J. Un-Splintering Urbanism:Examining the Integration of Urban Infrastructures[D]. Sheffield:University of Sheffield, 2018:91-162.
[70]	Ascensão E. The slum multiple:A cyborg micro-history of an informal settlement in Lisbon[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015,39(5):948-964.
[71]	de Souza e Silva A. From cyber to hybrid:Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces[J]. Space and Culture, 2006,9:261-279.
[72]	Shaw D B. Streets for cyborgs:The electronic flâneur and the posthuman city[J]. Space and Culture, 2015,18(3):230-242.
[73]	甄峰,顾朝林.信息时代空间结构研究新进展[J].地理研究,2002, 21(2):257-266.[Zhen Feng, Gu Chaolin. New perspectives on spatial structure research in information era[J]. Geographical Research, 2002,21(2):257-266.]
[74]	黎智枫,赵渺希.赛博空间视角下中国三大城市群网络特征——基于豆瓣跨城活动数据[J].人文地理,2016,31(6):102-108.[Li Zhifeng, Zhao Miaoxi. City networks in cyberspace:Using Doubanevent to measure the cross-city activities in urban agglomeration of China[J]. Human Geography, 2016,31(6):102-108.]
[75]	李德仁,朱庆,李霞飞.数码城市:概念、技术支撑和典型应用[J].武汉测绘科技大学学报,2000,25(4):283-288,311.[Li Deren, Zhu Qing, Li Xiafei. Cybercity:Concepts, technique support and typical applications[J]. Journal of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping, 2000,25(4):283-288,311.]
[76]	Boj C, Díaz D. The hybrid city:Augmented reality for interactive artworks in the public space[M]//Sommerer C, Jain L C, Mignonneau L. The Art and Science of Interface and Interaction Design. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2008:141-161.
[77]	Dear M. Postborder cities, postborder world:The rise of Bajalta California[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2005,23:317-321.
[78]	Mcgee T G. Interrogating the production of urban space in China and Vietnam under market socialism[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2009,50(2):228-246.
[79]	Brenner N. What is critical urban theory[J]. City, 2009,13(2/3):198-207.
[80]	Marcuse P. From critical urbanism to right to the city[J]. City, 2009, 13(2/3):185-197.
[81]	Harvey D. The right to the city[J]. New Left Review, 2008,53:23-40.
[82]	Swyngedouw E. Modernity and hybridity:Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1999,89(3):443-465.
[83]	Braun B. Environmental issues:Writing a more-than-human urban geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2005,29(5):635-650.
[84]	Gandy M. The Fabric of Space:Water, Modernity, and the Urban Imagination[M]. Cambridge and London:The MIT Press, 2014.
[85]	Schweitzer L, Stephenson M J. Right answers, wrong questions:Environmental justice as urban research[J]. Urban Studies, 2007,44(2):319-337
[86]	Anderson B, McFarlane C. Assemblage and geography[J]. Area, 2011,43(2):124-27.
[87]	Ong A, Collier S J. Global Assemblages:Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 2005:12.
[88]	McCann E, Roy A, Ward K. Assembling/Worlding cities[J]. Urban Geography, 2013,34(5):581-589.
[89]	Rodgers S, Barnett C, Cochrane A. Where is urban politics?[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2014,38(5):1551-1560.
[90]	Murdoch J, Marsden T. The spatialisation of politics:Local and national actor spaces in environmental conflict[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1995,20(3):368-380.
[91]	Gregson N. Agency:Structure[M]//Cloke P, Johnston R. Spaces of Geographical Thought. London:Sage, 2005:21-41.
[92]	Jones M. Phase space:Geography, relational thinking, and beyond[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2009,33(4):487-506.
[93]	Fishman R. Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century:Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 1982:3.
[94]	Wu F. Emerging Chinese cities:Implications for global urban studies[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2016,68(2):338-348.
[95]	McFarlane C, Robinson J. Introduction-experiments in comparative urbanism[J]. Urban Geography, 2012,33(6):765-773.
[96]	Ren J, Luger J. Comparative urbanism and the ‘Asian city’:Implications for research and theory[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2014,39(1):145-156.
[97]	Robinson J. Comparative urbanism:New geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2016,40(1):187-199.